The importance of the trade off between accuracy and simplicity in the pursuit of knowledge

Areas of knowledge to be used: Mathematics and natural science My teacher suggests: Be careful to think hard about what simplicity vs.

The importance of the trade off between accuracy and simplicity in the pursuit of knowledge

Pico Dyer for NYT: What do we know? Possible essay questions about the nature of knowledge: May "In knowledge here is always a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity.

How does language create webs of illusions of knowledge? What is the difference between information, knowledge and propaganda? It can be difficult to distinguish between genuine, well founded knowledge claims and pure and utter nonsense.

Throughout the Theory of Knowledge course you are encouraged to become that bit more critical and that bit less gullible by developing real life situations into knowledge questions.

The importance of the trade off between accuracy and simplicity in the pursuit of knowledge

As Richard Van de Lagemaat puts it, it is better to ask yourself the question 'How should we believe? To distinguish between fact and fiction in your search for knowledge, it is also invaluable to analyse yourself as a knower.

By evaluating the way in which the eight ways of knowing may help us to make sense of the world, we can critically examine the validity of knowledge claims and their justifications -- rather than just debunking them without being able to justify our point of view.

The ways of knowing can be a check on our instinctive judgements and they prevent us from deluding ourselves. The Dove commercial transforms 'the girl next door' into a billboard beauty. Which questions does this raise about sense perception as a way of knowing?

The importance of the trade off between accuracy and simplicity in the pursuit of knowledge

Can we 'calculate' beauty through Maths? Is there a scientific basis for beauty? Or is it a culturally relative concept? Dubious knowledge claims in advertising.

An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.

Should you trust your first impressions and instinctive judgements? How do we check the validity of knowledge claims? Under which circumstance can we trust expert opinions?

Finding the right balance between gullibility and scepticism is not always easy. How gullibility leads to the acceptance of erroneous knowledge claims. But is this always the case? Dangers of authority worship A truly excellent documentary on the importance of the two way relationship between shared and personal knowledge.

They discuss how and why people according to Shermer feel compelled to believe strange things. The examples given by Shermer to illustrate human gullibility are certainly entertaining. According to Shermer, we are pattern seeking animals. To guarantee our survival, we have been looking for patterns for centuries better to be safe than sorry.

Shermer argues that we still feel compelled to see patterns, whether they exist or not and he illustrates this in "The pattern behind self-deception". The believing brain Shermer and Why people believe strange things. If your find it difficult to follow the arguments especially if English is not your first languageyou can always check out the transcripts on the TED websites themselves.

Patterns and ink blot test: To what extent do ways of knowing prevent us from deluding ourselves? Specimen There is no such thing as a neutral question. November Is explanation a prerequisite for prediction? November "Knowledge within a disciple develops according to the principles of natural selection.

May "Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished. May "In knowledge there is always a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity.Standard approaches to curve-fitting effect a trade-off between fit to a sample of data and the simplicity of the kind of mathematical relationship that is posited to hold between the variables—that is, the simplicity of the postulated model for the underlying relationship, typically measured in terms of the number of adjustable parameters it.

The findings reveal that marketing program creativity is a function of individual problem-solving inputs (e.g., knowledge of the marketing environment, diversity of experience, diversity of. “In knowledge there is always a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity.” Evaluate this statement in relation to two areas of knowledge.

The First Set of data The Second set of data Most of human knowledge has to do with noticing facts and regularities that could have been found out using existing knowledge.

When it comes to accuracy, the regularized model results in a % larger V NLS value compared to the SMILE model, indicating a trade-off between the model accuracy and simplicity.

Important notice on using materials from this website.

However, by looking at Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, which portray the fit of the initial SMILE model and the regularized model to the measured FRFs, one can see no. Sep 17,  · "In knowledge there is always a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity." Evaluate this statement in relation to two areas of knowledge This essay question was the first one that jumped out at me.

I like it because there is so much to talk about with the complications and ambiguity of knowledge. The natural sciences as an area of knowledge. scientific knowledge. This process is quite important in the a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity.".

TOK essay help! "“In knowledge there is always a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity.” : IBO